Here is an interesting thought from one of my readings . . .
"We must remember that what is true for Jesus, Peter and Paul is no doubt also true for churches, since most of the Bible is written in plural and since the Scripture repeatedly show that the way of God is through weakness. If the church is most faithful to its true vocation as a created power through the weakness that gives way to God's tabernacling, then we must ask such questions as these:
1) Why have we turned pastors into successful CEOs instead of shepherds for the weak?
2) Why do we search for pastors who are handsome, sophisticated, charismatic - instead of models in suffering?
3) Who do our churches adopt practices of business life and its achievement models?
4) Why do we resort to gimmicks, or what Jacques Ellul calls Technique, instead of practicing an 'unadulterated handling of the Word'?"
I would guess the answer to most of these question arise from the fact that we all have become all too comfortable in our suburban Western lifestyle - wanting nothing to do with hardship and suffering. Thus, the Gospel has become another middle-class luxury and right that can only be bought when we have achieved the right financial and social status.
Friday, March 14, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I agree wholeheartedly...The Church has lost the meaning of what it means to have a pastor...We should be people set apart to pray, study the Word and shepherd the people...Not CEOS with church growth tactics...My five years in the pulpit almost made me sick at times when the temptation to fit into our Western view of church success was presented...We don't have to be that way Seung! A new generation can rise up...Next time you take a church, insist on a Study instead of an Office... :)
Blessings Friend!
Dave Nagel
We should be paying MUCH more attention to Ellul's teaching on technique. It may be the only thing that keeps churches from becoming "religious businesses."
Post a Comment